Found 180 with Last Name = 'del giudice' and Initial = 'mr' 
Affinity DataKi: 0.130nM ΔG°: -55.9kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.390nM ΔG°: -53.2kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.10nM ΔG°: -48.1kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 4.70nM ΔG°: -47.1kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 6.60nM ΔG°: -46.2kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 8.90nM ΔG°: -45.5kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 12nM ΔG°: -44.8kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 21nM ΔG°: -43.4kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 23nM ΔG°: -43.2kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 26nM ΔG°: -42.9kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 42nM ΔG°: -41.7kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 47nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 51nM ΔG°: -41.2kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 65nM ΔG°: -40.6kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 81nM ΔG°: -40.1kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 89nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 90nM ΔG°: -39.8kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 92nM ΔG°: -39.8kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 97nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 103nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 123nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 130nM ΔG°: -38.9kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 136nM ΔG°: -38.8kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 147nM ΔG°: -38.6kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 178nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 186nM ΔG°: -38.0kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 190nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 215nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 247nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 395nM ΔG°: -36.2kJ/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 412nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 476nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 540nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 557nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 928nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.01E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.10E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.15E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.34E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.38E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.58E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.88E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.92E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.08E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.60E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.03E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.50E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.60E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.64E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.83E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
